The Mellor Law Firm, APLC

California Real Estate, Construction, Bankruptcy, Foreclosure and Business Litigation Lawyers

    • Facebook
    • LinkedIn
    • RSS
    • Twitter
    • YouTube

Call: (951) 221-4744

  • Our Firm
  • Attorney Profile
  • Practice Areas
    • Real Estate Law
    • Construction Law Attorney
    • Experienced Foreclosure Attorney Serving Riverside Homeowners
    • Business Law
    • Chapter 7 Bankruptcy
    • Chapter 13 Bankruptcy
    • Contract Disputes
    • Insurance
    • Loan Modifications
    • Personal Injury & Wrongful Death
    • Mechanic’s Lien
  • Case Handling
  • Clients
  • Blog
  • Contact

California Real Estate Law News

February 4, 2012 by Leave a Comment

Recently, at the conclusion of last year, 2011, California courts issued a number of important rulings in the area of real estate litigation.  Let me briefly mention the first two here and next week I will provide a synopsis of the other two worthy of your consideration.  The first two I want to profile for you here deal with default judgments in quiet title actions and the improper granting of a motion for summary judgment based upon an unconscionable loan transaction.  Citations and links have been provided for ease of reference.

AN EVIDENTIARY HEARING IS REQUIRED BEFORE ENTERING DEFAULT JUDGMENT IN A QUIET TITLE ACTION.  CCP §764.010 provides that in actions to quiet title, the court shall not enter judgment by default but shall in all cases require evidence of plaintiff’s title and hear such evidence as may be offered respecting the claims of any of the defendants.  The appellate court found this obligated the trial court to hold an evidentiary hearing in open court “hearing the defendant’s evidence.”  The dissent states a defendant should not be permitted to participate in the hearing.  Harbour Vista LLC v. HSBC Mortgage Services Inc.  (Cal. App. Fourth Dist., Div. 3;  December 19, 2011) 201 Cal.App.4th 1496.

TRIABLE ISSUES EXIST AS TO WHETHER A FORECLOSURE SALE SHOULD BE SET ASIDE DUE TO THE UNCONSCIONABILITY OF THE LOAN TRANSACTION.  An action in which a homeowner sued a lender, a loan servicer and others to set aside a trustee’s sale claiming predatory lending, the trial court granted summary judgment against the homeowner.  In reviewing the transaction, the appellate court noted the refinance was for $1.5 million with a monthly payment of $12,381.36 and the homeowner had a monthly income of $3,333.  The Sixth District Court of Appeal reversed the grant of summary judgment finding there was sufficient evidence of triable issues of material fact regarding alleged unconscionability of the transaction.  Lona v. Citibank, N.A. (Cal. App. Sixth Dist.;  December 21, 2011) 202 Cal.App.4th 89.

If you need help from a highly-qualified real estate lawyer in California, please contact Mark Mellor at (951) 221-4744.

 

Filed Under: Real Estate Law News

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.

Call Us: 951-222-2100

Consultations available in-office or over
the phone. Speak to one of our leading attorneys in California today.

Recent News

What Is Commercial Litigation and How Does It Affect Your Business?

May 23, 2025 By Mark Mellor

Every business, regardless of its size or industry, faces unique challenges. Among these, legal disputes can often be the most daunting and disruptive. Commercial litigation, a specialized area of law, serves as a framework for resolving disputes arising from business … Read More...

Common Types of Real Estate Fraud

May 21, 2025 By Mark Mellor

Real estate transactions are some of the most significant financial decisions you’ll make in your lifetime. Unfortunately, the complexity of these deals creates opportunities for fraud. Whether you’re a buyer, seller, or investor, knowing how to protect yourself and recognize … Read More...

Everything You Need to Know About Adverse Possession in California

April 11, 2025 By Mark Mellor

Adverse possession is a legal concept that might sound surprising—it allows someone to claim ownership of property they don’t legally own, as long as specific conditions are met. While this might bring to mind images of opportunists taking over abandoned properties, adverse … Read More...

Follow Mellor Law Firm

    • Facebook
    • LinkedIn
    • RSS
    • Twitter
    • YouTube

Our Areas of Practice

  • Comprehensive Real Estate Legal Services
  • Construction Law Attorney
  • Mechanic’s Lien – Stop Notice
  • Experienced Foreclosure Attorney Serving Riverside Homeowners
  • Business Law
  • Contract Disputes
  • Chapter 7 Bankruptcy
  • Chapter 13 Bankruptcy
  • Insurance
  • Lien Stripping Bankruptcy
  • Loan Modifications
  • Personal Injury & Wrongful Death
  • Property Ownership

Navigate

  • Home
  • Our Firm
  • Mark Mellor
  • Practice Areas
  • Case Handling
  • Clients
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Blog
  • Privacy Policy

Practice Areas

  • Comprehensive Real Estate Legal Services
  • Construction Law Attorney
  • Mechanic’s Lien – Stop Notice
  • Experienced Foreclosure Attorney Serving Riverside Homeowners
  • Business Law
  • Contract Disputes
  • Chapter 7 Bankruptcy
  • Chapter 13 Bankruptcy
  • Insurance
  • Lien Stripping Bankruptcy
  • Loan Modifications
  • Personal Injury & Wrongful Death
  • Property Ownership

Recent Posts

  • What Is Commercial Litigation and How Does It Affect Your Business?
  • Common Types of Real Estate Fraud
  • Everything You Need to Know About Adverse Possession in California
  • Understanding the Statute of Limitations for Wrongful Death Claims

Follow Us

    • Facebook
    • LinkedIn
    • RSS
    • Twitter
    • YouTube

Contact our offices

The Mellor Law Firm, APLC
6800 Indiana Avenue, Suite 220
Riverside, CA 92506
Phone: (951) 221-4744
Fax: (951) 222-2122
10.0Mark Albert Mellor

The Mellor Law Firm, APLC © 2025. All Rights Reserved.