A doctor brought an action against a hospital alleging both race and gender discrimination in several ways in different causes of action. The trial court granted the hospital’s anti-SLAPP motion, and the doctor appealed. The appellate court, while recognizing the hospital’s peer review process was involved in the doctor’s termination, reversed with regard to the causes of action for harassment and IIED because the claims do not arise from protected activity under Code of Civil Procedure section 425.16. (DeCambre v. Rady Children’s Hospital-San Diego (Cal. App. Fourth Dist., Div. 1; March 11, 2015) (As Mod. April 2, 2015) 235 Cal.App.4th 1, [184 Cal.Rptr.3d 888].)
