Plaintiff brought a class action against defendant under 15 U.S.C. § 1679 (the Credit Repair Organizations Act; CROA). The federal trial court entered summary judgment in favor of defendant, reasoning defendant did not make any promises of credit improvement but instead promised to provide consumers’ credit score. The Ninth Circuit reversed, finding defendant is a credit repair organization for purposes of CROA because defendant “through the representations it made on its website and in its television advertising, offered a service, in return for the payment of money, for the implied purpose of providing advice or assistance to consumers with regard to improving the consumer’s credit record, credit history, or credit rating.” (Stout v. Freescore, LLC (Ninth Cir.; February 21, 2014) 743 F.3d 680.)
Leave a Reply
You must be logged in to post a comment.