Credit card was marketed to be used to “rebuild poor credit.” The company was sued in a class action for misrepresentation. Credit card users signed arbitration agreement in the application. But the Credit Repair Organizations Act [CROA; 15 U.S.C. §1679c(a)] states: “You have a right to sue a credit repair organization that violates the [Act].” The trial court found that Congress intended claims under the CROA to be con-arbitrable, and the Ninth Circuit affirmed. The United States Supreme Court reversed, finding the Federal Arbitration Act [ FAA; 9 U.S.C. §1] required the matter be arbitrated, and that “had Congress meant to prohibit these very common [arbitration] provisions in the CROA, it would have done so in a manner less obtuse.” CompuCredit Corp. v. Greenwood (U.S. Sup. Ct.; January 10, 2012) 132 S.Ct. 665, [181 L.Ed.2d 586].
Leave a Reply
You must be logged in to post a comment.