Attorney Fees And Costs Properly Awarded To Interpleader.

Wife is found dead in the street outside the home she shared with husband. Her death is investigated as a homicide. Husband, who is the sole beneficiary on wife’s life insurance policy, is a suspect. Life insurance company files an interpleader action and deposits the policy benefits plus interest with the trial court. Wife’s mother, who would be entitled to the policy benefits if husband were found to have feloniously and intentionally killed wife, defaults in the action. The court awards husband the interpleaded funds less attorney fees and costs requested by the life insurance company. Husband contends the attorney fees and costs award is erroneous because his right to the policy benefits never was in dispute and no potential for double liability existed, thus rendering the interpleader action unnecessary and the statutory requirements for attorney fees and costs unmet. In affirming, the appellate court concluded the life insurance company was entitled to file an interpleader action, and the court did not err by exercising its discretion to award attorney fees and costs. Farmers New World Life Insurance Company v. Rees (Cal. App. Second Dist., Div. 1; August 30, 2013) 219 Cal.App.4th 307, [161 Cal.Rptr.3d 678].