After a tenant moved into a shopping center, its share of expenses for property taxes, insurance and common maintenance substantially exceeded the landlord’s pre-lease-signing estimates. The tenant sued for fraud, rescission based on mutual mistake, mistake of fact, breach of lease and breach of the implied covenant of good faith and fair dealing. The trial court […]
Geographic Information System (GIS)-Formatted Databases Are Public Records & Must Be Produced Upon Request At The Actual Cost Of Duplication.
The California Supreme Court’s opinion’s first paragraph speaks for itself: “Like many counties in California, Orange County (the County) maintains a large database of information about land parcels in a geographic information system (GIS) file format. With this database, called the OC Landbase, a user with appropriate software can create a layered digital map containing information […]
Development Of Solar Project To Go Forward Despite Williamson Act contract.
A county cancelled a Williamson Act contract [Government Code section 51200] and certified an Environmental Impact Report [EIR] for a proposed solar power plant. The trial court denied a petition for extraordinary relief challenging certification of the EIR and the cancellation of the contracts brought by environmental groups trying to halt the proposed development. Under a […]
No Private Right Of Action For Tenant.
Plaintiff was a tenant on property for which a bank took title at foreclosure. The bank served her with a three-day notice of termination and then immediately initiated an unlawful detainer action. Plaintiff contends the bank was required to serve a 90-day notice of termination prior to eviction. She filed an action against the bank in […]
Dismissal Of Predatory Lending Action Reversed.
Plaintiffs initiated an action against a loan broker and various financial institutions, claiming “pursuant to a scheme of predatory lending, [they] made material misrepresentations and fraudulent concealments of circumstances in the appraisal of the residence and in the terms of the loan in order to maximize their profit.” They alleged they applied for a residential home […]
When Trying To Effect Service Of Process In Unlawful Detainer Cases What Is “Reasonable Diligence?”
Code of Civil Procedure section 415.45, provides that summons may be served on an unlawful detainer defendant by posting it on the premises, along with notice sent by certified mail to that address, if the court determines that “the party to be served cannot with reasonable diligence be served in any manner specified in this article [i.e., […]
Fifteen Percent (15 %) Interest Not Usury.
Plaintiff borrowed money from a mortgage lender secured by a deed of trust on certain real property. The interest rate was 15%, with interest-only payments from 2009 until 2012. When plaintiff defaulted, the lender foreclosed. Plaintiff filed suit against the lender claiming the interest rate on the loan exceeded the maximum allowed by the California Constitution, […]
Notification Requirement In Foreclosure Sale Set Forth In Code of Civil Procedure § 729.050 Is Not Satisfied By Common Law Presumption Of Regularity.
A homeowners association notified homeowners they were delinquent in paying their monthly assessment fees. After the homeowners disputed the debt, the association conducted a nonjudicial foreclosure sale. The homeowners brought an action to set aside the foreclosure sale and the trial court granted summary judgment in favor of the association. The appellate court reversed, after rejecting […]
Anti-SLAPP Motion Should Not Have Been Granted.
A landlord served a tenant with a three-day notice to cure or quit, and the tenant brought an action against the landlord requesting declaratory relief and alleging breach of contract and intentional interference with contract. The landlord filed an unlawful detainer action, and with regard to the tenant’s complaint, filed an anti-SLAPP motion under Code of […]
Adverse Possession Law Students Will Be Tortured With Blackacre Hypos Based On This One!
Owner of a 30-acre parcel of land [owner #1] placed a boundary fence in the wrong place in 1987. Since then, owner #1 has been occupying and improving the .44-acre of the 173-acre parcel owned by owner #2, a religious group. Owner #1 paid no taxes on that .44-acre piece of land, but, because it was […]
- « Previous Page
- 1
- …
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- Next Page »