In a copyright infringement action, which also contained various state law claims, the trial court dismissed plaintiff’s complaint after plaintiff did not comply with the trial court’s order to remove the matter to federal court. In reversing the dismissal, the appellate court stated: “The court’s order of dismissal was based on two erroneous assumptions. The first […]
Exhaust Your Administrative Remedies. Or Else, Where There’s Smoking, There’s Firing.
Plaintiff worked for the State of California and the California Assembly. He complained to his supervisor that another supervisor was smoking inside the working premises. Two weeks later, plaintiff was fired. Plaintiff brought an action for retaliatory discharge, and defendants demurred, arguing the court lacked jurisdiction because plaintiff failed to exhaust his administrative remedies pursuant to […]
No Showing Reservation Of Rights By Insurers Creates A Conflict Of Interest.
A city brought an action against a dry cleaner under the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability Act [CERCLA; 42 U.S.C. § 9601] for causing soil and groundwater contamination. The dry cleaner asserted a third party claim against the supplier of dry cleaning products, and the supplier tendered its defense to certain insurance companies. The insurers […]
In Attorney Disciplinary Action, Trial Court Lacked Subject Matter Jurisdiction, But Ordered Sanctions.
A member of the State Bar sought to vacate a stipulation she had entered with the State Bar regarding two attorney disciplinary actions against her. The State Bar filed a special motion to strike under Code of Civil Procedure section 425.16 [antiSLAPP statute], which the superior court granted, along with $2,575.04 in sanctions against the lawyer. […]
Refusing To Step Aside And Seizing A Letter Of Credit A Landlord, Whose Lease With A Bank Was Disaffirmed By FDIC In A Bank Takeover, Has To Return Asset And Is Now On Hook For Attorney Fees.
In an imminent bank takeover, the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation [FDIC] sold the assets of a failed bank to a takeover bank. Among the assets was a $500,000 letter of credit which had been demanded by the failed bank’s landlord to cover any future rents. As part of the takeover, the FDIC disaffirmed the failed bank’s […]
Defendant Did Not Waive Jury By Not Filing Jury Fees When A Fee Waiver Had Been Granted.
The trial court denied defendant a requested jury trial because no jury fees had been posted. The appellate court found error and reversed, stating “because defendant obtained a waiver of jury fees, he was not required to deposit the $150 advance jury fees five days before the date set for trial.” Kim v. De Maria (Cal. […]
Arbitration For One Part Of An Action, But Not The Other.
In a class action against both DirecTV and Best Buy, plaintiffs allege a scheme to deceive, involving the apparent sale of equipment that was actually only leased to customers. The district court ordered the matter into arbitration. The Ninth Circuit found that DirecTV’s arbitration agreement is enforceable under the holding in AT&T Mobility v. Concepcion (2011) 131 […]
Right To Repair Act Does Not Eliminate Homeowner’s Common Law Rights.
A homeowner purchased a newly constructed home from defendant. A pipe burst, resulting in significant damage. The homeowner’s insurer, plaintiff, paid the expenses and repair costs and then brought an action in subrogation for recovery. The trial court found the subrogation action was time barred under the Right to Repair Act [Civil Code section 895], and […]
Trial Court Lacked Evidence To Grant A Motion In Limine So The Jury Verdict Was Reversed.
In a business dispute after a 20-year business relationship, goods were delivered by plaintiff to defendant, and the invoices correctly listed the agreed upon price of the goods. The trial court denied plaintiff’s motion in limine to preclude evidence that would vary the express terms of 33 invoices, interest payments as late charges. But in purportedly […]
Code of Civil Procedure section 998 Expert Costs For Defendant After Voluntary Dismissal Prior To Trial.
Plaintiff was injured in a fall in a supermarket. Defendant’s overtures toward settlement under Code of Civil Procedure section 998, as well as defendant’s demand for exchange of expert witnesses were ignored by plaintiff. Defendant moved in limine to preclude the use of experts by plaintiff, and plaintiff dismissed the action prior to a ruling. Defendant […]
- « Previous Page
- 1
- …
- 20
- 21
- 22
- 23
- 24
- …
- 36
- Next Page »