A lawyer filed a class action lawsuit against Toshiba on behalf of a class of purchasers of laptops which had an electrostatic discharge problem. The trial court awarded $165,000 in sanctions against the lawyer and awarded her no attorney fees, even though she requested $24 million. The appellate court described in detail “the arduous procedural […]
National Rifle Association’s Preemption Argument On Gun Control Rejected.
Both the appellate and trial courts held a county ordinance which precludes the possession and use of guns in the county’s parks and recreational areas was not preempted by state law. In its amicus brief, the National Rifle Association argued the state of California has impliedly occupied the field and that “visiting Carry License holders will […]
Seller’s Agreement To Subordinate Its Security Interest To That Of The Bank’s Unenforceable.
The court’s first paragraph says it all: “This case involves competing claims of lien priority between the seller of real property, which took back a security interest on property sold to a developer, and the bank which financed development of the project through a construction loan. The issue is whether the seller’s agreement to subordinate its […]
Treble Damages To Salespersons Who Had No Written Contract.
Plaintiff agreed to use his experience and connections in the high-tech electronic industry to help grow a company owned by defendants. Plaintiff prepared a written document outlining the business relationship with defendants, which included his understanding he would receive 50 percent of the net profits from all sales resulting from his efforts and contacts. The parties […]
Fiduciary Duty Of Disclosure: Pretty Soon They’ll Be Talking About Real Money.
A male lawyer and a female married in 1985. In 2000, he entered into an “of counsel” relationship with a law firm specializing in securities litigation which entitled him to a referral fee of 10 percent in a class action. In 2003, the couple separated and the two entered into a marital settlement [MSA] agreement in […]
Sterilization Of Developmentally Disabled Woman Is Incidental To Medcally Necessary Treatment Ordered By Court.
A developmentally disabled woman suffers from numerous health problems, including an abnormally long and heavy menses and debilitating migraine headaches that usually coincide with the onset of her menses. After numerous other treatments for her severe menstrual bleeding and migraines failed, her doctors recommended a hysterectomy and oophorectomy. The trial court found Probate Code section 2357 […]
The Doctrine Of Respondeat Superior: Is This The End Of Company Christmas Parties???
An employee consumed alcoholic beverages at an employer hosted party and became intoxicated. The employee arrived home safely, but then left to drive a coworker home. During that drive, the employee struck another car, killing its driver. The trial court granted summary judgment for the employer on the ground the employer’s potential liability under the doctrine […]
“He’s A Sociopathic Narcissist”… Opinion Or Fact?
Building owners brought a libel action against a former tenant who posted a review of the apartment building on a Website: “Sadly, the Building is (newly) owned and occupied by a sociopathic narcissist—who celebrates making the lives of tenants hell. Of the 16 mostly-long-term tenants who lived in the Building when the new owners moved in, […]
Another Dangerous Condition Of Highway Claim Rejected By Court.
Plaintiffs were injured in car crash and brought an action for dangerous condition of highway against a county. The trial court granted summary judgment in favor of the county and the appellate court affirmed, stating: “The evidence established that the accident was caused by [another driver’s] intentional act of crossing the double yellow line into oncoming […]
Right To Repair Act Does Not Eliminate Homeowner’s Common Law Rights.
A homeowner purchased a newly constructed home from defendant. A pipe burst, resulting in significant damage. The homeowner’s insurer, plaintiff, paid the expenses and repair costs and then brought an action in subrogation for recovery. The trial court found the subrogation action was time barred under the Right to Repair Act [Civil Code section 895], and […]
- « Previous Page
- 1
- …
- 63
- 64
- 65
- 66
- 67
- …
- 105
- Next Page »